Showing posts with label marketing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label marketing. Show all posts

Saturday, 23 February 2008

Advertising Linux, and the Results of my Crackpot Psychology Experiment

Last week I wrote an article discussing why Linux isn't very popular on the desktop. I argued the point that people don't value that which comes too easily. And Linux, being free, falls in that category. I then decided to do an experiment - during this week, I advertised Ubuntu to my friends as a posh elitist OS that costs over $500.

The reaction was unanimous:

People don't care.
They were interested in the visual effects and intrigued by the fact that there aren't any viruses. But the price didn't make any difference. This confirms that people simply assume OS's are free.

All of the above means one thing. I officially had my first crackpot theory. Wheeee!

Advertising Linux


So what's the best way to advertise Linux?

My own experience as well as those of other readers suggest this:
  1. Be seen is public using Linux.
  2. If someone curious asks what's that on your computer, briefly explain, highlighting the advantages. (Another plus: If someone is computer-savvy enough to notice you're using something unusual, they have the right stuff to give Linux a shot)
  3. If they're interested, offer to burn them a live CD (explain what an awesome thing a live CD is)
Another important aspect in advertising anything is keeping your power.

When advertising Linux, there's a specific way to do this. Don't be needy. We don't need more Linux users. We like having more users, but we don't need them.

Also make it clear Linux won't try to satisfy all their whims. Linux is NOT Windows. Make it quite clear Linux won't do all the same things as Windows. It doesn't try to.

A reader comment expresses this nicely:

I usually "sell" Linux by saying over and over againt that "Linux is great, it's simple to use, the Beryl 3D desktop graphics is stunning, it's stable, it never crashes, you never have to reinstall it.

But see, you can't have it - you simply don't have enough skill. Not that it's difficult to install or use, anyone can do that. But I don't think you can handle it.

You can't have it, I'm sorry,"

Strangely, this turns them on, and they soooo want to try out Linux. And when they do install it, I never get any complaints about it being to difficult to install or use =)
The message is clear: Linux isn't here to satisfy you personally. It just is what it is. If you can't handle it, that's your problem.

If you can make that clear, you will create happy Linux users. And you will weed out those we don't want in our community anyway.

Next saturday, I'll post more self-improvement material. I've got a real killer article in the works, one that immediately creates positive changes in your life! Until then.

Long days and pleasant nights.

###

Response to readers' comments from last week

A couple of people pointed out "dog's bollocks" actually means "great". Thanks. I promise to never misuse the term again. Cuz that would be dog's bollocks.

No, really, thanks for pointing it out.

---

To all of you who expressed support with my experiment - I love you guys.

To all you who disagreed, I respect that you have a different opinion. (And apparently you're right. And I'm wrong. Sigh. Just don't go around saying "Told you so! Nyah nyah nyah!")

But my heart goes to the rarest of you out there. A very special group. Those who used Windows, then switched to Linux for some months, and then decided to go back to Windows. I really respect you for making an informed decision (unlike most Windows users). I also pity you for not having the great first Linux experience I had. Guess I got lucky with my hardware.

---

vishal said:

(...) problem is that as soon as a person is hearing the word linux...he makes the picture of some dreadfull, hard to use, meant for geeks OS in his mind (...)
Strange. When I mention Linux, all I get is a blank stare. Still, just in case, I prefer using "Ubuntu" when advertising my distro to people.

---

And finally, several readers' comments strung together (slightly out of context):

(...) Linux (...) turns (...) me (...) on (...)
Booyah!


### This blog has moved to http://anamazingmind.com/blog/. Please update your bookmarks.

Saturday, 16 February 2008

Why Linux Doesn't Spread - the Curse of Being Free

Linux isn't very popular on the desktop. It's a far third behind OS X, which is a very far second behind Windows. Most people cite pre-installed operating systems as the reason. But as a student of psychology, I see something most people don't. There's one big factor in why Linux isn't popular on the desktop. Linux is free. I know this sounds like complete dog's bollocks, but hear me out before judging my sanity.

We can all remember the story of Tom Sawyer. At one point, Tom had to whitewash a fence. When one of his friends happened along, Tom tried to persuade and bribe the friend to help him. Needless to say, it didn't work.

A few moments later, as Tom was unhappily whitewashing the fence, another friend stumbled along to jeer at Tom's misfortune. This time Tom decided on a cunning plan. He ignored the friend, and seemed very absorbed in the whitewashing. Soon the friend became intrigued, because what could be more interesting than talking to a friend? Shortly thereafter, he started begging Tom to let him whitewash a bit of the fence. Tom wouldn't give in.

The friend offered Tom some of his most valuable possessions if Tom would just let him whitewash a little bit. Tom reluctantly agreed, secretly jumping with joy on the inside. More friends happened along, coming to laugh at Tom for having to whitewash a fence. Tom simply did his act, and they all stayed to help whitewash, and paid for the privilege!

The above story illustrates a basic human nature. We don't value things we can get easily. Yet we'd climb mountains, cross rivers and travel across deserts just to reach something we can't easily get our hands on.

The computer world


The same thing applies in the world of computers. Humans are naturally suspicious of that which comes too easily. Imagine you were promoting an expensive brand of champagne. If you were running around forcing free samples into people's hands, they would be very wary. But if you set up a stand where you would offer small samples for $10 each ("Special promotional price! Normally costs three times as much!"), people would see your champagne as posh and valuable.

It's still the same champagne. Yet your presentation radically changes people's perception of it.

Which brings me to Linux. There's one problem with Linux getting to new users. It's free.

That's right. Linux being free is a problem in reaching new customers.

Why Windows pwnz Linux - an imaginary case study


Let me show you an example where Windows is better than Linux (I don't mean better as in actually better :p).

Ignore for a moment all the crap about Windows being pre-installed and such. Let's say you have a computer-newbie friend, called Compy McNewb, who's just bought a new computer and is getting ready to install an OS.

He's got two computer-savvy friends. You, who urges him to use Linux. And another friend, who urges him to use Windows.

Which one will Compy pick? Let's go through the reasoning.
  • Linux is being offered for free. Good.
  • He can get a pirated copy of Windows from his friend. Also for free. Good.
  • But Windows is sold for over three hundred dollars, while Linux is offered for free.

Here's what Compy McNewb sees. He can get both OS's for free. But one of them is worth over three hundred dollars, while the other one is worth nothing.

"That's not true!" I hear you scream. "Linux is worth a lot! It's just being offered for free!" I know it's not true that Linux is worth less than Windows. It's far more valuable to the end user in terms of getting things done.

But that's not what Average Joe Computer Newbie sees. He sees a free product versus a three-hundred-dollar product he can get free. It's all about the perception!

In the 1970's, a record label in Britain was selling albums containing cover versions of contemporary songs. Although the records sold for less than a pound a copy, hardly anyone bought them and the record company was suffering.

A whizz-kid joined the board and announced he wanted to more than double the price of the records. The other executives were shocked, but eventually agreed to his plan. Within a few weeks, the records were flying off the shelves.

When the records didn't cost much, people didn't value them. The record company was saved by redefining people's perception of their product.

Taking Action


So here I am, wondering how to turn the tables around.

And I've got an idea. In the past, I tried to convert people to Linux (specifically Ubuntu). None of them really stuck. Back then I focused on all those great aspects of Linux. Being purely factual and objective.

But I have since learned people don't act rationally. They act based on irrational emotions - like in the above examples. So here's the question. Could I turn the perception around? What if I presented Linux in a way that makes people drool? Make it look more expensive than Windows, more cool than a Mac, more posh than a ten-million-dollar villa in the Caribbean?

Here's my plan:

I'm going to present Ubuntu as a very expensive posh OS. I'll mention it sells for upward of five hundred dollars in the States. I'll say I managed to get an illegal copy off a Polish guy I know over the internet.

Only THEN will I mention all the positives. Multiple desktops, bullet-proof security, stunning visual effects. Somehow all of it makes sense in the context of a super-expensive elitist OS. I'll see how many people I can convert when advertising Linux this way.

I'll post exactly a week from now, reporting back on how my Linux Preaching v2.0 went. Hi yo, Silver, AWAAAAY!


### This blog has moved to http://anamazingmind.com/blog/. Please update your bookmarks.